O'Pinions & O'Bservations O' O'Bscure O'Briania


Return to Main Page

The Walker

Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 09:34:48 -0800
From: Susan Wenger

In "The Walker," O'Brian writes:

"One's mental processes, and especially the wandering fantasies that pass through one's mind as one walks, are linked by a chain of association so slight that it usually cannot be traced. A bramble will claw out from a thicket: one pushes on automatically, and then in half an hour one will find that one has been dwelling on the Passion for the last mile of the road."

I love the way he describes feelings/thoughts/sensations this way. He takes an experience that everyone has, and puts it into words so neatly that I don't realize right away how much he has captured some ephemeral notion.

This description of mental processes seems to describe what O'Brian aims at when he writes. He offers up an image, an impression, a hint, a trace, and leaves you with it. If you don't catch it, you don't know what you missed. Sometimes I worry over a word or phrase, CERTAIN that he meant something special by his choice of words, but I can't see it until someone explains something, and then I marvel out how I could have missed it.

Sometimes I don't even catch the trace until someone else smokes it out for us in gunroom. And sometimes it will be so obvious to me that I don't even mention it, and watch agape while others worry over what it could have meant.

O'Brian uses this technique very effectively in this story - he offers up a flash of what the narrator sees on his walk, and the man walks on, and there IS connection between the things he sees and the general tenor of the entire story. Perfect craftsmanship, this tale.

=====

"Who wishes to be a meagre sailorman if he can be a learned and enter the government service? Why, in time you might be an official and never do anything for remainder of earthly existence. You could grow long fingernails, and become obese and dignified. " -
Patrick O'Brian


Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 17:24:59 PST
From: "P. Richman"

Is The Walker still under discussion?

O'Brian mentions walking past the destroyed German searchlight. A few paragraphs later there's a wet brass ring with a swastika.

Are these references to German things a foreboding of indescribable inexplicable evil to come? Do you see from mention of Germans and swastikas that someone is going to get exterminated for no reason?


Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 05:08:30 -0800
From: Susan Wenger

--- "P. Richman" wrote:
Is The Walker still under discussion?

O'Brian mentions walking past the destroyed German searchlight. A few paragraphs later there's a wet brass ring with a swastika.

Are these references to German things a foreboding of indescribable inexplicable evil to come? Do you see from mention of Germans and swastikas that someone is going to get exterminated for no reason?

All stories previously discussed remain open for discussion. "The Walker" is the current story under discussion.

That's an interesting question. Allusions are hard to pin down exactly, but yes, I agree with your idea - I SHOULD have known from the allusions that something dreadful would happen, but as usual, O'Brian doesn't draw unmistakeable arrows to his plots - anything can happen in an O'Brian short story! Thank you for point this out - it sounds very right.

- Susan


Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:23:53 -0500
From: Don Seltzer

[Note: Don wrote one post on The Soul, The Path, and The Walker. For organizational purposes, I've divided it into separate parts for each story. -- J.F.]

And finally, The Walker. Again my excitement as I realize that he is describing himself and his favorite walks in his home of Collioure (other than his description of himself as a big, heavy man). I am sure from his detailed account that I could follow the same path and find the same beach and cliffs. But then that little jump into the "chain of thought" reference, and the fantasy story of Joseph and Martine Albere. Except for the end, it is hard to tell whether he is still factually recounting his experiences in the village. And then the surprising end which reminded me a bit of the conclusion to "Losing Nelson".

Don Seltzer


Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 05:18:18 -0800
From: Susan Wenger

Here's a new light on "The Walker:"

Per Dean King's biography of Patrick O'Brian:

When "The Walker" appeared in Harper's Bazaar magazine, the magazine commented in its editorial note: "A haunting narrative of strange rretribution, it was construed differently by every editor on the Bazaar."

In an author;'s note following the story, O'Brian provided the two origins of the strange tale. The first was Pdsalm 91, which he quoted roughly: "You shall not fear the terrors that come by night; nor the arrow that flies by day, nor the evils prepared in the shadows; nor the demon that destroys at noonday." In the Latin version of the psalm, he noted, the demon walks in the noonday sun.

The second source was a legend O'Brian had heard concerning three seamen who rob a priest and then die horrible deaths one at a time on land. O'Brian combined the two, the narrator being the devil, a man possessed but who thinks he acts for God.

"The walking, you see," O'Brian explained, "seems to me an essential part of his madness and his possession; and clearly the evil men of the local legend are precisely those who are to fear the horrors of the night, the arrow that flies by day, the wickedness in the shadows and the high-noon demon."

=====

"Who wishes to be a meagre sailorman if he can be a learned and enter the government service? Why, in time you might be an official and never do anything for remainder of earthly existence. You could grow long fingernails, and become obese and dignified. " -
Patrick O'Brian


Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 05:58:17 -0800
From: Marshall Rafferty

On Wed, 8 Mar 2000 05:18:18 -0800, Susan quoted in part:

In an author;'s note following the story, O'Brian provided the two origins of the strange tale. The first was Psalm 91, which he quoted roughly: "You shall not fear the terrors that come by night; nor the arrow that flies by day, nor the evils prepared in the shadows; nor the demon that destroys at noonday." In the Latin version of the psalm, he noted, the demon walks in the noonday sun.

I'll be darned, I read the story aright without knowing it. I think I sometime think too much about these things. Still very impressed by the haunting vision of post-war detritus washing ashore along the Mediterranean. Must have been terrible.

Marshall


From: John Finneran
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 3:55 PM

"The Walker" is one of O'Brian's most interesting and complex short stories to date.

The beginning of the story could easily stand on its own, as the narrator discusses walking, and his attempts to construct a satisfying walk in the countryside around him. The "real aim of a walk," he says, "for me is a half-conscious gentle, physical exercise, the perfect accompaniment to reflection. I do not say that the countryside is anything but superb, and for one who walks to see magnificence these paths are ideal: but that is not my aim, and sometimes I long for an ordinary sober country lane, a way through the level cornfields or a towpath along a quiet river or a sea wall between salt flats and a marsh." (p. 70, page numbers throughout from Norton pb).

This first part is excellent, like something out of Samuel Johnson's Rambler, and the narrator comes off as sympathetic, reflective, and a man you could easily identify with, especially if you enjoy walking yourself.

In the course of this first part, we learn a bit about the walker: that he enjoys walking, of course; that he is living in a small village near the sea; that he lives amongst "quiet and civil" people (p.71); and that he is "a big, heavy man" (p.70). This physical description is quite important and is repeated almost verbatim near the story's end ("I am a very big, heavy man", p.79).

At the end of his synthetically constructed walk, he comes to "a shingle beach" (p.72) where he occassionally comes across "a savage old man, a solitary, and I do not speak to him nor him to me" (p.73).

Also at the beach are reminders of the Second World War. (The story appears to take place in southern France.) There is a "destroyed German searchlight" and a "huge domed gun-emplacement home" and one day he finds "a cheap ring, the kind that is sold in fairs" with a swastika upon it: "no doubt it had belonged to one of the Germans drowned here in the war. The ring filled me with repulsion, like a thing unclean: the round was so much the answering shape to the finger that had fitted it that I shuddered and threw it far into the sea, wiping my hands on the pebbles afterward. A human finger, by itself without a hand, is a disgusting thing. A human finger in the sea." (p73)

On another occassion, he finds a human pelvis, presumably from another drowned German. The walker comments, "Ordinarily, I suppose, a human bone would raise some emotion, some emotion resembling piety; it would be a disturbance of decency, a kind of profanation on the shore. But I felt no such emotion as I sat looking at this bone: I connected it with death, but with no particular death." (p.74)

Then comes a reflection (previously quoted by Susan) on the general procession of thoughts through one's mind: "One's mental processes, and especially the wandering fantasies that pass through one's mind as one walks, are linked by a chain of association so slight that it usually cannot be traced. A bramble will claw out from a thicket: one pushes on automatically, and then in half an hour one will find that one has been dwelling on the Passion for the last mile of the road." (p.74)

In the next part of the story, we learn a bit about Joseph and Martine Albčre, the mysterious elderly couple he is living with. Joseph is a man of wealth, but "not a man of high standing" in the community (p.75). They live together in their large house, the walker their only lodger, neither of them going out very much, and never together. At night, one or both of them, would creep through the house, inspecting each room from the top of the house to the bottom (pp.75 - 76).

At last, the walker learns the history of M. Albčre from "a Dutch painter", "a fat, exuberent man" (p.77): Approximately thirty years previously, Albere and two other villagers were crewmen aboard a packet ship, the Jules-Bastide, running between France and North Africa. One day, amidst "a black gale of wind", "one solitary priest, indifferent to the weather, stayed on the afterdeck" (p.77). This priest carried a mysterious black valise with him at all times. "In the morning the priest was missing. Nobody knew anything about it: the official inquiry revealed nothing whatever." (p.78)

Albčre and his two fellow villagers were the only crew members on that part of the ship at the time. Soon after, each of them quit the sea and make big purchases. The first buys a cafe, which burns within a year, killing him and his wife. The second buys a farm; within three years, his son is killed in a motorcycle accident and the man hangs himself. Albčre buys the house and three boats and has been waiting his doom ever since. He and his wife have brought in the walker "as some kind of protection (the lightning, they thought, would not strike a house where a just man lived)" (p.78).

Then we get the first clear sign that the walker is mentally unhinged (quickly and overwhelmingly confirmed in the 2 final pages of the story) as he reflects, "I had thought that it might be the beginning of the day of wrath, but when I looked at the stars I found that I was wrong: I had been unable to move Aldebaran" (p.78).

The full extent of his madness quickly becomes clear:

"I was the hand of God again; the wrath of a jealous God Who spoke through the prophet and ploughed the Amalekites into the ground. And without any knowledge I had been set there in my place for a long year past: oh, it was the sweetest realization in the world, this kindness done to me.

"Clearly I knew it was not for the murder I had been sent: no, no; it was for accidie. These wicked people had despaired of all forgiveness: they had hardened their hearts, and for that last wickedness they were to be destroyed in this world as they were already damned in the next." (p.79)

Between half past three and four o'clock in the morning, he hears the Albčres on their nocturnal inspections and "run[s] out out with my black coat over my nakedness, barefoot up behind them." He springs upon them shrieking, "The priest, the valise, the priest, ha ha ha ha ha." (p.79) After chasing them around, nearly choking on his own laughter the while, he ascends the stairs : "I flew, I say, I flew, and smashed them down on the far stone floor."

And the story ends: "It was finished almost before it had begun. I had meant a full night's inspired, enormous ecstasy, and I had wasted it in half an hour. Before it had started it was done: they had died without a mark; and I had not set the sign." (p.80)

There are numerous things to say about this story.

The short stories have been full of religious references, most of them fleeting and subtle. "The Walker" brings the religious themes to the surface: a horrible, distorted, dysfunctional religiosity, which begins subtlely with an (apparently) passing reference to the Passion (the betrayal, trial, and death of Jesus). Just what the walker thought of the Passion is not spelled out: on a first reading we might assume he is thinking of sacrificial love (Jesus sacrificing His life for the sake of humanity); but, based on what we later learn about the walker, we might now think he was thinking of the betrayal or the details of the scourging and crucifixion.

The fuller manifestation of his dysfunctional religiosity is fairly obvious (thinking he is the hand of a vengeful God, etc.). O'Brian himself stated that he meant the walker to be "the devil, a man possessed but who thinks he acts for God". (Quote is Susan Wenger's summary from her earlier post of PO'B's comments in Harper's as reported by Dean King. Let's see: that makes it a fifth-hand quote by me.)

With dysfunctional religiosity comes dysfunctional mental balance, along with dysfunctional sexual desire (about which more in a moment).

What's the significance of the walker's self description as "a big, heavy man" (important enough to be stated twice)? I see three possible significances: first, physically, the walker is precisely the opposite of O'Brian himself (a small, slim man). Since PO'B is using the first person throughout, this may be his way of emphasizing that the walker is NOT him.

Second, how do we square the walker's physique with his constant exercise? If he takes long walks every day (especially in the "blazing heat" (p.70) of the long summer), why is he so big and fat? The pedestrian explanation (that he still consumes more calories then he works off in his exercise) may very well be right, but there are two other intriguing possibilities: (a) he has some sort of chemical or glandular disorder that may very well have mental as well as physical effects; or (b) he does not walk at all: his "walking" all takes place in his mind, in his room at night. (He always seems to be around when the Albčres are doing something interesting in the house.)

The final significance of emphasizing the walker's heaviness is that it emphasizes that he is not a physically attractive man; again, I'll return to this in a moment.

The incident with the solitary man on the beach I see as a metaphorical, early warning sign about the walker. The solitary man seems similar to St. Anthony, or another hermit monk, who lives alone in the desert, and is visited and tempted by demons, but will have nothing to do with them.

The part about the German ring, pelvic bone, etc., I think is largely an attempt to misdirect the reader: at this point in the story, the walker still seems very sympathetic, and the incident seems to confirm his sensitivity: here's a man, we might think, who is affected by the death of another, even if that other was the enemy of his country (making the assumption that the walker was French or English or American; in any event, on the opposite side as the Germans).

But if we look closely at the walker's reaction, we can see that his reaction is less horror at the loss of human life than what appears to be an obsessive-compulsive horror at things being out of the order that he thinks they should be in. Thus he thinks that a "human finger, by itself without a hand, is a disgusting thing. A human finger in the sea." (p73), but an ENTIRE hand would not necessarily provoke the same reaction: he thinks later, without any apparent squeamishness, of thieves with "their hands cut off" (p. 78). Similarly, the pelvis, being "white, dry and smooth, symmetrical and polished to inhumanity" and altogether "like a shell" fit in with the beach, and was not "a disturbance of decency, a kind of profanation on the shore" (p.74).

The walker finds the ring to be "a thing unclean", but because of its shape to the finger that wore it, and the finger not being attached to a hand, etc., and NOT, as we might assume on a first reading, because of the swastika on it. The swastika is interesting, in that it introduces Naziism as an idea (as distinct from the German servicemen) into the story. Naziism is another theme that has appeared in previous short stories, associated with evil, and darkness, and now with demonism.

As for the priest story: it appears that the priest was killed by Albčre and his two fellow villagers and that they stole his valise. What was in the valise? Money or gold, perhaps, or perhaps it was something like the monkey's claw (was this a Poe story?), that grants its owner his wish but at the price of his doom. Now where did the valise, or its contents, come from?

An especially interesting possibility is given if we look at "The Path", the story immediately before "The Walker" in The Rendezvous and Other Stories. (I know the stories weren't written in the order in which they appear, but I am more and more convinced that their placement is no coincidence, but that certain themes are developed across successive stories.) In "The Path", there is another myserious priest, and a backpack with unidentified "bad revelations" (p.68) within it. In "The Walker", is it the same priest? Does he have in his valise now what was in the backpack previously?

Now let's look more closely at the climactic killings: the walker wears only his "black coat over [his] nakedness" and as he springs and jumps and runs about, shrieking, howling, and laughing, we can imagine that his coat is flying about, exposing the nakedness beneath; and if we look at the language he uses while on his killing spree -- "delight" (p.79), "pleasure" (p.79), "I had meant a full night's inspired, enormous ecstasy, and I had wasted it in half an hour" (p.80) -- the conclusion is inescapable: he is experienceing a perverse sexual delight in his murders. And remember, he is a "a big, heavy man" (i.e., not at all physically attractive), thus stripping the scene of any slight eroticism it may have, and rendering it all the more obscene.

One final point on the significance of the title, and why I found it particularly significant:

Ten years ago, I lived in Paris (as part of junior year abroad in college), and being young and tall (6'2'', which is moderately tall by American standards, but a giant by French standards), I had no fear about walking the Paris streets at any hour of the night or day, which I often did, both to get from point A to point B, and to help me think (the "half-conscious gentle, physical exercise, the perfect accompaniment to reflection" mentioned at the beginning of the story).

One night, probably around ten p.m. or so, I was walking along and a young Frenchman, with shabby clothes, an unshaven face, and fanatic eyes approached me. "I know you," said he (and this all in French).

Well, I didn't know him, but I was willing to listen for a bit. I didn't know what he was going to say but I was fairly sure that it would end with an appeal for money.

"I've seen you," he said, pausing for a moment, then continuing, "You are A Walker. Yes, a Great Walker (un grand coureur)".

I was still there waiting for the punch line, when he turned and walked off, looking back at me to shake his head up and down knowingly, as if he'd solved one of the great mysteries of life, and adding once again, "Yes, A Great Walker."

I had no idea what he thought he meant by that, and I still don't; but I was convinced then, and still am, that there was some sort of (literally) insane explanation. And, no, he wasn't drunk or high, just, as far as I could tell, mentally disturbed.

And now let's look once more at what O'Brian had to say about his story: "The walking, you see," said O'Brian, "seems to me an essential part of his madness and his possession".

Yes, I think that's right; and I think O'Brian had an insight into what phantasms my interlocutor that night had floating through his mind as he thought of The Walker, The Great Walker.

John Finneran


From: Charles Munoz
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 1:06 PM

Sometimes a story is written from deep within a writer's experience. The best seem to come from a strongly emotional experience, and I think that "The Rendezvous" is such a story--the hero, having failed, goes through a mythic passage, a journey to the underworld in symbolism, before coming back to ordinary life at least partially restored.

But sometimes a story comes from shallower parts of the writer's mind. When he sat down to write "The Walker," I can imagine POB saying "What shall I write today. Well, I've been reading Poe, so I'll do a Poe story about a man who turns out to be a murderous lunatic, or maybe an avenging angel, or devil, or both. A horror story, and I'll start off slowly and end with a bang and, since I'm POB, I'll work a lot of nature stuff into it."

Well, he does start off slowly, more slowly than Poe does. For a couple of pages, unless you knew what was coming, you wouldn't guess where the story was going to go. There's vy little foreshadowing, and the world is not quite a satisfactory place, but not an ominous place.

But then he sees asphodel, and I'm reminded of the Burning Fields of "The Rendezvous," wch are the fields of the entrance to the underworld. Asphodel, of course, is the flower of the dead. So...the little river he walks along, the river which becomes a tunnel when the hedges on both sides grow over it, the river at the end of which is a savage, perhaps dangerous man...what river but Styx, and who is the savage stranger but Charon? Yet I don't see that POB makes much use of this once he establishes it; however, once the Walker has passed the Styx, the story begins to plunge downward toward its catastrophe, wch John Finneran has discussed so excellently.

Charlezzzz


From: Isabelle Hayes
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 2:06 AM

This story begins with a man describing the walk he has developed, and it reads very like other such descriptions POB has written so well, in the A&M books; only that the man describes himself as very big and heavy is it different; none of POB's admirable characters is very heavy, even JA who is very big;

After reading John Finneran's insightful post, I read the story very carefully, trying to find when I began to realize that the narrator was baaad;

at the end, I guess, when he tells us he couldn't make the star move, was when there was no doubt he was mad, although it could have been a shorthand for he didn't watch long enough to see the heavens make their usual rotation;

this was a real horror story, especially the part when he tells us they died immediately, when he had expected hours and hours of ecstasy, meaning he would have tortured them is my guess;

and I think a horror story is beneath the really superb writer, because it's too easy a way to get your readers to feel a "frisson", very related to a sexual turn-on;

another angle in this story that I really liked was when we're told that the "victims"' real sin was not the murder of another, but "accidie", which means despair, lack of hope; and it was for that they had to be killed by the angel of death the narrator considers himself to be;

the very next story is The Soul, in which the woman, although she's died and is a disembodied soul, knows she has to keep on trying;

it was probably not a coincidence that these two are in order, and that POB, something of an existentialist, was telling us that we have no option in this vale of tears but to do our best, and not to despair even though the universe never does give us any encouragement.

Isabelle Hayes


From: John Finneran
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 11:44 PM

Isabelle Hayes wrote:

another angle in this story that I really liked was when we're told that the "victims"' real sin was not the murder of another, but "accidie", which means despair, lack of hope; and it was for that they had to be killed by the angel of death the narrator considers himself to be;

There's a very interesting discussion of accidie at the following web site:

http://www.oflightanddarkness.com/black/accidie.html

(This site appears to be for a role-playing game). All of the below is copied from this site:

Accidie: rejecting life... is a Middle English word, retrieved because the usual word, "sloth," now only expresses a trivial laziness. Accidie is a form of spiritual despair, a refusal of grace, a bargain with nothingness that shuts out God's gift of the new possibility.

Usually called sloth, laziness, dejection, passive-aggressiveness, despair or spiritual depression nowadays, accidie is a spiritual listlessness or depression, a reluctance and finally a refusal to respond to God. Accidie begins at the center, at our relationship with God, and it stems ultimately from a refusal to live toward God as dependent creatures made in his image. It is a passive shrinking from creative existence. The style of accidie would be to dampen down one's inner life, living at a minimum level of mind and heart, letting thoughts and feelings die down.

Accidie is a partial consent to non-being, striking a bargain with insignificance. Another way to sin by accidie is to empty out one's self in idle worship rather than growing toward God, seeking significance in some other human being or cause or circumstance, scrabbling after a sense of self-worth. Self-abdication offers a temporary refuge both from God and from the nothingness that stalks creative life. The fruit of accidie is despair. In its terminal form it finally rejects God's new possibility. It rules out grace, shutting any opening to the divine life.

Accidie has its full effect when one puts oneself intentionally beyond the reach of God's mercy. Spiritual withdrawal and depression often start with dishonest prayer, refusing to raise some issue with God, rejecting a summons, getting tired of God's silence and walking away. It chooses to live and die on the margins of its own nothingness rather than launch out further into the abyss of God. It leaves the self independent from God and in control, even at the price of self-minimization. Those who bargain with nothingness can avoid surrender to God.


From: John Finneran
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 12:10 AM

Charlezzzz wrote:

But then he sees asphodel, and I'm reminded of the Burning Fields of "The Rendezvous," wch are the fields of the entrance to the underworld. Asphodel, of course, is the flower of the dead. So...the little river he walks along, the river which becomes a tunnel when the hedges on both sides grow over it, the river at the end of which is a savage, perhaps dangerous man...what river but Styx, and who is the savage stranger but Charon?

Another interesting similarity between "The Walker" and "The Rendezvous" is the imagery of the towpath, which both protaganists seek.

Thus in "The Walker": "sometimes I long for an ordinary sober country lane, a way through the level cornfields or towpath along a quiet river" (p. 70). The walker is unable to find a towpath (or a country lane, etc.) so constructs his own artificial path.

The narrator in "The Rendezvous" begins by following the towpath (p.108), but goes off it to the burning fields (p.110), he then feels lost and menaced, but finally feels safe after finding the towpath again (p. 115)

So if Charlezzzz'z analysis is correct and the river is the Styx, the towpath is perhaps the proper journey of the soul: going off the path leads one into the realm of the demoniac. Some are able to get back on the path (the rendevouser) and some are not (the walker)

John Finneran


From: John Finneran
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 12:51 AM

One more message on "The Walker" from me tonight:

In the inner story of the priest with the valise, the packet ship is named the Jules Bastide. The name is given twice (p.77), though there's no dramatic need to give the name at all, suggesting the name may be significant.

I did a bit of research on Bastide, and was able to find out a bit (but not that much) about him: He was a French republican, involved in the 1830 and 1848 revolutions. Between the two revolutions, he edited a republican newspaper. After 1848 and the beginning of the short lived Second Republic, he was elected to the Assemblie nationale and served for a few months in 1848 as Foreign Minister. I wasn't able to find out anything about Bastide's specific beliefs, especially the degree of his anti-clericalism (common amongst republicans of the era), if any.

The most significant thing related to the story that I was able to find was that Bastide was a member of the Charbonnerie, a secret society that was the French equivalent of the Italian Carbonari. Here is some of what the 1908 Catholic Encyclopedia has to say about the Carbonari/Charbonnerie (taken from http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03330c.htm):

"One of the underlying principles of the society, it is true, was that the 'good brotherhood' rested on religion and virtue; but by this was understood a purely natural conception of religion, and the mention of religion was absolutely forbidden. In reality the association was opposed to the Church ... Initiation into the society was accompanied by special ceremonies which, in the reception into the grade of master, imitated the Passion of Christ in a manner actually blasphemous. The members were bound by a frightful oath to observe absolute silence concerning whatever occurred in the vendita [local assembly]. The similarity between the secret society of the Carbonari and Freemasonry is evident. Freemasons could enter the Carbonari as masters at once. The openly-avowed aim of the Carbonari was political: they sought to bring about a constitutional monarchy or a republic, and to defend the rights of the people against all forms of absolutism. They did not hesitate to compass their ends by assassination and armed revolt. As early as the first years of the nineteenth century the society was widespread in Neapolitan territory, especially in the Abruzzi and Calabria. Not only men of low birth but also government officials of high rank, officers, and even members of the clergy belonged to it."

Note the themes above that may be related to the story: opposition to the Church, the Passion (or more correctly: a blasphemous imitation of the Passion), secret assassinations, a conspiracy even encompassing clergymen.

Any additional information on Jules Bastide and the Carbonari/Charbonnerie would be welcome. (And note that while the actual facts are one thing, the perception of the facts are also important. The Catholic Encyclopedia's article, however factually correct it is, most probably represents the Catholic view of the Charbonnerie, circa 1908, and perhaps also the metaphorical view PO'B has in mind.)

John Finneran


From: Charles Munoz
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 8:02 AM

In a message dated 6/26/0 11:11:47 PM, John.Finneran@PILEOFSHIRTS.COM writes:

the towpath is perhaps the proper journey of the soul

Yes. Consider what happens on a towpath: it's used to pull along a heavy burden wch cd not otherwise be brought to its destination.

Charlezzzz


From: Rowen84@AOL.COM
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 8:48 AM

Damn, you guys are good at this stuff! Now did POB just subconsciously filter all of these allusions in, or actually THINK about them, or is it all a great conspiracy of coincidence and serendipity, like the salt?

Rowen


From: Charles Munoz
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 8:55 AM

In a message dated 6/27/0 10:48:22 AM, Rowen84 writes:

Now did POB just subconsciously filter all of these allusions in, or actually THINK about them, or is it all a great conspiracy of coincidence and serendipity, like the salt?

Yes. In the same way that the original dust jacket of Joyce's Ulysses is Blue and White.

Charlezzzz


Return to Main Page